考虑页岩基质不同孔隙特征的表观渗透率模型

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2022.10.08.02

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 109-118.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2022.10.08.02

考虑页岩基质不同孔隙特征的表观渗透率模型

李荷婷¹, 曾杰², 李真祥³, 路千里²

1. 中国石化西南油气分公司科技部, 四川成都 610041;
2. 油气藏地质及开发工程全国重点实验室·西南石油大学, 四川成都 610500;
3. 中国石化勘探分公司, 四川成都 610041

收稿日期:2022-10-08 出版日期:2023-06-10 发布日期:2023-07-07
通讯作者: 曾杰,E-mail:jie.zeng@swpu.edu.cn
作者简介:李荷婷，1990年生，女，汉族，四川成都人，工程师，主要从事石油天然气勘探开发及科研项目管理方面的工作。E-mail：liheting.xnyq@sinopec.com；
曾杰，1991年生，男，汉族，四川南充人，副研究员，博士，主要从事非常规油气藏开发方面的研究工作。E-mail：jie.zeng@swpu.edu.cn；
李真祥，1965生，男，汉族，四川成都人，教授级高级工程师，主要从事石油工程方面的研究工作。E-mail：lizx.ktnf@sinopec.com；
路千里，1989年生，男，汉族，四川泸州人，副研究员，博士，主要从事储集层增产改造理论与技术、岩石力学、复杂裂缝扩展与流体流动数值模拟方面的科研与教学工作。E-mail：lu_qianli@swpu.edu.cn
基金资助:
博士后国际交流计划引进项目(YJ20220169)；国家自然科学基金青年科学基金(51904258)

Apparent Permeability Model Considering Different Pore Characteristics of Shale Matrix

LI Heting¹, ZENG Jie², LI Zhenxiang³, LU Qianli²

1. Science and Technology Department, Southwest Petroleum Branch, SINOPEC, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China;
2. National Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
3. SINOPEC Exploration Company, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China

Received:2022-10-08 Online:2023-06-10 Published:2023-07-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 页岩基质含气量大、供气时间长，其渗透率随地层孔隙压力变化的演化直接影响气藏的长效产气能力。基质中微纳米孔隙发育，有机孔隙和无机孔隙的力学性质和流体传输机理各异，有效应力和流态变化都将影响其表观渗透率。此外，有机质中的吸附气使岩体发生吸附变形也不同程度地影响表观渗透率。基于孔弹性理论，考虑有机孔隙和无机孔隙中不同岩石力学参数、流体流动机理以及有机孔隙吸附变形的特点，建立了适用于页岩基质的表观渗透率模型，分析了不同孔隙参数对表观渗透率的影响，揭示了表观渗透率演化的主控因素。结果表明，在定压注气和采气过程中，页岩基质表观渗透率的演化均与时间有关，主要受稀薄气体效应、有效应力变化以及有机孔隙周围局部吸附膨胀或解吸附收缩影响。表观渗透率演化过程的主控因素随时间变化，同时与有机孔隙、无机孔隙的体积占总孔隙体积的比例有关。

关键词: 页岩, 基质孔隙, 表观渗透率, 吸附应变, 流态

Abstract: Shale matrix stores a larger amount of gas and provides a long-term gas supply for shale gas production. Therefore, matrix permeability variation with the change of pore pressure directly affects long-term productivity. Micro- and nano-pores are well developed in shale matrix. These organic and inorganic pores involve different mechanical properties and gas transport mechanisms, the variation of effective stress and flow regimes all affects their apparent permeability. Moreover, gas-adsorptioninduced organic matter swelling also influences the apparent permeability to varying degrees. Based on the poroelasticity theory, this paper establishes an apparent permeability model suitable for shale matrix with consideration of different mechanical properties and fluid flow mechanisms in organic and inorganic pores and gas-adsorption-induced deformation. The impacts of different pore properties are analyzed, and the controlling factors for apparent permeability evolution are figured out. Results indicate that shale matrix apparent permeability evolution is time-dependent during constant-pressure gas injection and depletion. The evolution process is mainly dominated by gas rarefaction effects, effective stress variation, and localized sorption-induced swelling or desorption-induced shrinkage near organic pores. These factors control apparent permeability at different times. The evolution process is also related to the ratios of the volume of organic and inorganic pores to the total pore volume.

Key words: shale, matrix pores, apparent permeability, sorption-induced strain, flow regime

中图分类号:

李荷婷, 曾杰, 李真祥, 路千里. 考虑页岩基质不同孔隙特征的表观渗透率模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(3): 109-118.

LI Heting, ZENG Jie, LI Zhenxiang, LU Qianli. Apparent Permeability Model Considering Different Pore Characteristics of Shale Matrix[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2023, 45(3): 109-118.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2022.10.08.02

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2023/V45/I3/109

参考文献

[1] 邹才能,赵群,丛连铸,等.中国页岩气的开发进展,开发潜力及发展前景[J].天然气工业, 2021, 41(1):1-14. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2021.01.001 ZOU Caineng, ZHAO Qun, CONG Lianzhu, et al. Development progress, potential and prospect of shale gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(1):1-14. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2021.01.001
[2] 谢和平,高峰,鞠杨,等.页岩气储层改造的体破裂理论与技术构想[J].科学通报, 2016, 61(1):36-46. doi:10.1360/N972015-00262 XIE Heping, GAO Feng, JU Yang, et al. Novel idea of the theory and application of 3D volume fracturing for stimulation of shale gas reservoirs[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2016, 61(1):36-46. doi:10.1360/N972015-00262
[3] 郭少斌,王子龙,马啸.中国重点地区二叠系海陆过渡相页岩气勘探前景[J].石油实验地质, 2021, 43(3):377-385. doi:10.11781/sysydz202103377 GUO Shaobin, WANG Zilong, MA Xiao. Exploration prospect of shale gas with Permian transitional facies of some key areas in China[J]. Petroleum Geology&Experiment, 2021, 43(3):377-385. doi:10.11781/sysydz202103377
[4] 邹才能,潘松圻,荆振华,等.页岩油气革命及影响[J].石油学报, 2020, 41(1):1-12. ZOU Caineng, PAN Songqi, JING Zhenhua, et al. Shale oil and gas revolution and its impact[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(1):1-12.
[5] NEIL C W, MEHANA M, HJELM R P, et al. Reduced methane recovery at high pressure due to methane trapping in shale nanopores[J]. Communications Earth&Environment, 2020, 1(1):1-10. doi:10.1038/s43247-020-00047-w
[6] WASAKI A, AKKUTLU I Y. Permeability of organicrich shale[J]. SPE Journal, 2015, 20(6):1384-1396. doi:10.2118/170830-PA
[7] CHEN Zhiming, LIAO Xinwei, ZHAO Xiaoliang, et al. Development of a trilinear-flow model for carbon sequestration in depleted shale[J]. SPE Journal, 2016, 21(4):1386-1399. doi:10.2118/176153-PA
[8] CHEN Zhiming, LIAO Xinwei, ZHAO Xiaoliang, et al. A new analytical method based on pressure transient analysis to estimate carbon storage capacity of depleted shales:A case study[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2015, 42:46-58. doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.07.030
[9] 谭静强,张煜麟,罗文彬,等.富有机质泥页岩微纳米孔隙结构研究进展[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2019,38(1):1309-1324. doi:10.19658/j.issn.1007-2802.2019.38.027 TAN Jingqiang, ZHANG Yulin, LUO Wenbin, et al. Research progress on microscale and nanoscale pore structures of organic-rich muddy shales[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy Petrology and Geochemistry, 2019, 38(1):1309-1324. doi:10.19658/j.issn.1007-2802.2019.38.027
[10] 吴克柳,李相方,陈掌星.页岩气有机质纳米孔气体传输微尺度效应[J].天然气工业, 2016, 36(11):51-64. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2016.11.007 WU Keliu, LI Xiangfang, CHEN Zhangxing. Micro-scale effects of gas transport in organic nanopores of shale gas reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2016, 36(11):51-64. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2016.11.007
[11] JAVADPOUR F. Nanopores and apparent permeability of gas flow in mudrocks (shales and siltstone)[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2009, 48(8):16-21. doi:10.2118/09-08-16-DA
[12] 曲鸿雁,彭岩,刘继山,等.气体吸附对页岩裂缝表观渗透率和页岩气采收率的影响[J].中国科学(技术科学), 2018, 48(8):891-900. doi:10.1360/N092017-00196 QU Hongyan, PENG Yan, LIU Jishan, et al. Impact of gas adsorption on apparent permeability of shale fracture and shale gas recovery rate[J]. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2018, 48(8):891-900. doi:10.1360/N092017-00196
[13] 李靖,李相方,李莹莹,等.储层含水条件下致密砂岩/页岩无机质纳米孔隙气相渗透率模型[J].力学学报, 2015, 47(6):932-944. doi:10.6052/0459-1879-15-185 LI Jing, LI Xiangfang, LI Yingying, et al. Model for gas transport in nanopores of shale and tight formation under reservoir condition[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2015, 47(6):932-944. doi:10.6052/0459-1879-15-185
[14] WEI Mingyao, LIU Jishan, SHI Rui, et al. Long-term evolution of coal permeability under effective stresses gap between matrix and fracture during CO₂ injection[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2019, 130(3):969-983.
[15] LIU Xingxing, SHENG Jinchang, MA Chaoxin, et al. Complete coal permeability models from initial to ultimate equilibrium[J]. Fuel, 2020, 271:117612. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117612
[16] LIU Xingxing, SHENG Jinchang, LIU Jishan, et al. Evolution of coal permeability during gas injection From initial to ultimate equilibrium[J]. Energies, 2018, 11(10):2800. doi:10.3390/en11102800
[17] PENG Yan, LIU Jishan, PAN Zhejun, et al. Evolution of shale apparent permeability under variable boundary conditions[J]. Fuel, 2018, 215:46-56. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.024
[18] ZENG Jie, LIU Jishan, LI Wai, et al. Evolution of shale permeability under the influence of gas diffusion from the fracture wall into the matrix[J]. Energy&Fuels, 2020, 34(4):4393-4406. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c00219
[19] 李波波,陈帅,杨康,等.考虑气体传输和应力耦合作用的页岩表观渗透率演化机理[J].安全与环境学报,2021,21(1):201-209. doi:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2019.0922 LI Bobo, CHEN Shuai, YANG Kang, et al. Evolutionary mechanism of the apparent permeability of the shale in regard of its gas transfer and stress coupling[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2021, 21(1):201-209. doi:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2019.0922
[20] 段永刚,曹廷宽,杨小莹,等.页岩储层纳米孔隙流动模拟研究[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(3):63-68. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2015.03.16.03 DUAN Yonggang, CAO Tingkuan, YANG Xiaoying, et al. Simulation of gas flow in nano-scale pores of shale gas deposits[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science&Technology Edition), 2015, 37(3):63-68. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2015.03.16.03
[21] CIVAN F. Effective correlation of apparent gas permeability in tight porous media[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2010, 82(2):375-384. doi:10.1007/s11242-009-9432-z
[22] REISS L H. The reservoir engineering aspects of fractured formations[M]. Paris:Gulf Publication Corporation, 1980.
[23] ZENG Fanhui, PENG Fan, GUO Jianchun, et al. Gas mass transport model for microfractures considering the dynamic variation of width in shale reservoirs[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation&Engineering, 2019, 22(4):1265-1281. doi:10.2118/194494-PA
[24] ZENG Jie, LIU Jishan, GUO Jianchun. Characterization of gas transport in shale:A multi-mechanism permeability modeling approach[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 438:135604. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2022.135604
[25] LIU Jishan, WANG Jianguo, CHEN Zhongwei, et al. Impact of transition from local swelling to macro swelling on the evolution of coal permeability[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2011, 88(1):31-40. doi:10.1016/j.coal.2011.07.008
[26] PENG Yan, LIU Jishan, WEI Mingyao, et al. Why coal permeability changes under free swellings:New insights[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2014, 133:35-46. doi:10.1016/j.coal.2014.08.011
[27] 李相方,蒲云超,孙长宇,等.煤层气与页岩气吸附/解吸的理论再认识[J].石油学报, 2014, 35(6):1113-1129. doi:10.7623/syxb201406009 LI Xiangfang, PU Yunchao, SUN Changyu, et al. Recognition of absorption/desorption theory in coalbed methane reservoir and shale gas reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(6):1113-1129. doi:10.7623/syxb201406009
[28] CHEN Dong, PAN Zhejun, LIU Jishan, et al. Modeling and simulation of moisture effect on gas storage and transport in coal seams[J]. Energy&Fuels, 2012, 26(3):1695-1706. doi:10.1021/ef2014327
[29] PAN Z J, CONNELL L D. Modelling permeability for coal reservoirs:A review of analytical models and testing data[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2012, 92:1-44. doi:10.1016/j.coal.2011.12.009
[30] CUI X, BUSTIN R M. Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2005, 89(9):1181-1202. doi:10.1306/05110504114
[31] PENG Yan, LIU Jishan, PAN Zhejun, et al. Impact of coal matrix strains on the evolution of permeability[J]. Fuel, 2017, 189:270-283. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.086
[32] GAO Qi, HAN Songcai, CHENG Yuanfang, et al. Apparent permeability model for gas transport through micropores and microfractures in shale reservoirs[J]. Fuel, 2021, 285:119086. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119086
[33] LIU H H, RUTQVIST J. A new coal-permeability model:Internal swelling stress and fracture-matrix interaction[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2010, 82(1):157-171. doi:10.1007/s11242-009-9442-x
[34] GUO Pinkun, CHENG Yuanping, JIN Kan, et al. Impact of effective stress and matrix deformation on the coal fracture permeability[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2014, 103(1):99-115. doi:10.1007/s11242-014-0289-4
[35] CIVAN F, RAI C S, SONDERGELD C H. Determining shale permeability to gas by simultaneous analysis of various pressure tests[J]. SPE Journal, 2012, 17(3):717-726. doi:10.2118/144253-PA
[36] BESKOK A, KARNIADAKIS G E. Report:A model for flows in channels, pipes, and ducts at micro and nano scales[J]. Microscale Thermophysical Engineering, 1999, 3(1):43-77. doi:10.1080/108939599199864
[37] 吴克柳,李相方,陈掌星,等.页岩气复杂孔裂隙真实气体传输机理和数学模型[J].中国科学(技术科学), 2016, 46(8):851-863. doi:10.1360/N092015-00345 WU Keliu, LI Xiangfang, CHEN Zhangxing, et al. Real gas transport mechanism and mathematical model through complex nanopores and microfractures in shale gas reservoirs[J]. Scientia Sinica Technologica, 2016, 46(8):851-863. doi:10.1360/N092015-00345
[38] LYU Fangtao, NING Zhengfu, WU Xiaojun, et al. A comparative study of gas transport in dry and moisturized shale matrix considering organic matter volume fraction and water distribution characteristics[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 208:109483. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109483
[39] LETHAM E A. Matrix permeability measurements of gas shales:Gas slippage and adsorption as sources of systematic error[D]. Vancouver:The University of British Columbia, 2011.
[40] ZIMMERMAN R W, SOMERTON W H, KING M S. Compressibility of porous rocks[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research:Solid Earth, 1986, 91(B12):12765-12777. doi:10.1029/JB091iB12p12765

考虑页岩基质不同孔隙特征的表观渗透率模型

Apparent Permeability Model Considering Different Pore Characteristics of Shale Matrix

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	祝效华, 李瑞, 刘伟吉, 李枝林, 陆灯云. 深层页岩气水平井高效破岩提速技术发展现状[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(4): 1-18.
[2]	谭锋奇, 黎宪坤, 高阳, 李映艳, 张方. 吉木萨尔凹陷陆相页岩油储层测井定量解释[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(3): 29-48.
[3]	欧成华, 李航, 史百强, 张峙岳, 贺健. 川北典型陆相页岩——砂岩油气潜力表征与评价[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(3): 61-71.
[4]	王明筏, 文虎, 倪楷, 付小平, 杨鸿飞. 四川盆地北部大隆组页岩气地质条件及勘探潜力[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(1): 13-23.
[5]	王强, 赵金洲, 胡永全, 赵超能, 傅成浩. 页岩水力裂缝网络形态及激活机制研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(6): 71-86.
[6]	钟显康, 李浩男, 扈俊颖. 页岩气开采与集输过程中腐蚀问题与现状分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(6): 162-174.
[7]	左罗, 仲冠宇, 蒋廷学, 王海涛. 页岩微观结构及力学特征变化规律研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(5): 125-134.
[8]	赵圣贤, 刘勇, 冯江荣, 范存辉, 季春海. 长宁地区富有机质页岩脆性及与裂缝发育关系[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(4): 1-13.
[9]	覃建华, 杨琨, 丁艺, 张博宁, 唐慧莹. 基于KL-E的地质力学模型参数反演及应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(2): 65-78.
[10]	白杨, 李道雄, 李文哲, 李宏波, 罗平亚. 长宁区块龙马溪组水平段井壁稳定钻井液技术[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(2): 79-88.
[11]	梁兴, 单长安, 蒋佩, 张朝, 朱斗星. 浅层页岩气井全生命周期地质工程一体化应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(5): 1-18.
[12]	惠钢, 陈胜男, 王海, 顾斐. 基于改进残差的神经网络方法预测页岩气甜点[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(5): 19-32.
[13]	吴承美, 许长福, 陈依伟, 谭强, 徐田录. 吉木萨尔页岩油水平井开采实践[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(5): 33-41.
[14]	李俊乾, 卢双舫, 李文镖, 蔡建超. 基于过程分析法的页岩原位含气性评价[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(5): 42-55.
[15]	田振华, 周尚文, 李俊乾, 蔡建超. 基于气体扩散模型的页岩气体散失规律研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(5): 56-65.