一种基于水淹影响的相渗曲线重构方法

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2018.11.16.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对储层水淹对地层流体渗流规律影响刻画较难的问题，基于渤海典型疏松砂岩稀油油藏LD油田和稠油油藏Q油田密闭取芯井岩芯样品，开展水淹程度对油水相渗曲线影响实验研究。基于水淹对相渗影响认识，提取不同水淹程度下相渗曲线特征参数并重新组合，建立两种类型油藏考虑水淹影响的"全寿命"油水相对渗透率曲线。实验结果表明，与采用未水淹、弱水淹层段岩石样品完成的油水相对渗透率曲线相比，中水淹、强水淹层段相渗曲线束缚水饱和度更高，残余油饱和度更低，等渗点更偏右，驱油效率更高。与不考虑水淹情况相比，考虑水淹影响的重构相对渗透率曲线，其残余油饱和度和束缚水饱和度更低，含水饱和度相同时，两相相对渗透率均呈现整体降低趋势，最终驱油效率增大。与不考虑水淹影响的方案相比，考虑水淹影响的重构相渗在Q油田矿场数值模拟中应用，在含水98%时的采出程度提高近1%。

关键词: 疏松砂岩, 密闭取芯井, 水淹, 新鲜样品, 相对渗透率, 高含水

Abstract: Targeting the problem of difficulty in summarizing the influence of reservoir flooding on the laws of formation fluid seepage, a study on the influence of the flooding effect on oil-water relative permeability curve was conducted. The study used core samples from confined coring wells in Oilfield LD, which is an unconsolidated sand reservoir of thin oil rims, typically found in the Bohai Sea, and in Oilfield Q of heavy oil rims. Based on the influence of flooding effect on relative permeability, parameters characterizing the infiltration curves under different degrees of flooding were extracted and regrouped to construct the "full life cycle" oil-water relative permeability curves of the two types of reservoirs by considering the flooding effect. Experimental results show that, compared with the oil-water relative permeability curves of unflooded and weakly flooded samples, oil-water relative permeability curves obtained from layers that underwent medium to heavy flooding had higher saturation of the bound water and lower saturation of the residual oil with higher oil displacement efficiency, and their points of equivalent permeability were closer to the right. Reconstructed relative permeability curves that consider the flooding effect had lower saturation of residual oil and bound water than those that do not. When they both had the same water saturation, their two-phase relative permeability showed an overall downward trend with an enhanced oil displacement efficiency at the end. Applying the reconstructed relative permeability that considered the flooding effect into numerical simulation for Oilfield Q led to an improvement in the recovery percentage of almost 1% at 98% water content.

Key words: unconsolidated sand reservoir, confined coring well, flooding, fresh sample, relative permeability, high water content

中图分类号:

TE341

李金宜, 段宇, 周凤军, 朱文森, 信召玲. 一种基于水淹影响的相渗曲线重构方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(3): 151-159.

LI Jinyi, DUAN Yu, ZHOU Fengjun, ZHU Wensen, XIN Zhaoling. Method for Reconstructing Relative Permeability Curves Based on Flooding Effect[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(3): 151-159.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2018.11.16.01

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2019/V41/I3/151

参考文献

[1] 郎东升,秦秋寒,柳成志,等. 相对渗透率分析技术在录井油水层识别中的应用[J]. 大庆石油学院学报, 2003, 27(3):4-7. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2003.-03.002 LANG Dongsheng, QIN Qiuhan, LIU Chengzhi, et al. The application of relative permeability analysis technique to identifying oil-water bed[J]. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2003, 27(3):4-7. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2003.03.002
[2] 高楚桥,章成广,肖承文,等. 用油水相对渗透率确定低电阻油层产液性质[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2003, 30(5):80-82. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2003.05.024 GAO Chuqiao, ZHANG Chengguang, XIAO Chengwen, et al. Estimate produced fluid type of low resistivity hydrocarbon-bearing reservoirs from relative permeability[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2003, 30(5):80-82. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2003.05.024
[3] 蒋炳金,唐海,吕栋梁,等. 用相对渗透率曲线研究薄层底水油藏产水规律[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2006, 27(5):588-590. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2006.05.022 JIANG Bingjin, TANG Hai, LV Dongliang, et al. Research on water production law of reservoir with thin thickness and bottom water using relative permeability curve[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2006, 27(5):588-590. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3873.2006.05.022
[4] 刘丽萍. 相对渗透率分析用于核磁共振录井评价储集层油水产出能力[J]. 录井工程, 2014, 25(1):21-24. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2014.01.005 LIU Liping. Reservoir oil-water output capacity evaluation of NMR logging with relative permeability analysis[J]. Mud Logging Engineering, 2014, 25(1):21-24. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2014.01.005
[5] 龙明,徐怀民,陈玉琨,等. 结合相对渗透率曲线的KHK产量劈分方法研究[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2012, 34(4):114-118. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.-2012.04.024 LONG Ming, XU Huaimin, CHEN Yukun, et al. KHK production splitting method combined with relative permeability curve[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2012, 34(4):114-118. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2012.04.-024
[6] 陈伟,段永刚,方全堂. 水平井产能预测相关式研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 30(5):108-110. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1000-2634.2008.05.024 CHEN Wei, DUAN Yonggang, FANG Quantang. The study on horizontal well productivity prediction relational equation[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2008, 30(5):108-110. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1000-2634.2008.05.024
[7] 苗雅楠,李相方,周云健,等. 并购国外油田水平井产能快速准确预测方法[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2016, 38(5):640-644. doi:10.13639/j.odpt.2016.05.018 MIAO Ya'nan, LI Xiangfang, ZHOU Yunjian, et al. Fast and accurate prediction method about productivities of horizontal wells in merged overseas oilfields[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2016, 38(5):640-644. doi:10.13639/j.odpt.2016.05.018
[8] 刘彦成,罗宪波,康凯,等. 陆相多层砂岩油藏渗透率表征与定向井初期产能预测——以蓬莱19-3油田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1):97-103. doi:10.11698/PED.2017.01.11 LIU Yancheng, LUO Xianbo, KANG Kai, et al. Permeability characterization and directional wells initial productivity prediction in the continental multilayer sandstone reservoirs:A case from Penglai 19-3 Oil Field, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(1):97-103. doi:10.11698/PED.2017.01.-11
[9] 周明顺,范宜仁,刘志杰,等. 饶阳凹陷复杂砂岩储层产能测井预测方法[J]. 石油学报, 2017, 38(2):208-216. doi:10.7623/syxb201702008 ZHOU Mingshun, FAN Yiren, LIU Zhijie, et al. Logging prediction method for productive capacity of complex sandstone reservoirs in Raoyang Sag[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2017, 38(2):208-216. doi:10.7623/syxb201702008
[10] 贾英兰,贾永禄,周霞,等. 封闭油藏注水开发阶段注采比计算新方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(1):89-94. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2013.06.30.01 JIA Yinglan, JIA Yonglu, ZHOU Xia, et al. New calculation methods of injection-production ratio for waterinjecting development stage in closed reservoirs[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2014, 36(1):89-94. doi:10.11885/j.issn.-1674-5086.2013.06.30.01
[11] 杜利,陈清华,戴胜群. 应用油水相对渗透率曲线和动态数据确定水驱波及状况[J]. 油气地质与采收率,2003,10(4):45-46. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.-2003.04.016 DU Li, CHEN Qinghua, DAI Shengqun. Application of oil-water relative permeability curve and dynamic data to defining waterflood sweep situation[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2003, 10(4):45-46. doi:10.-3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2003.04.016
[12] 王者琴,吴晓慧,张永梅,等. 水驱曲线和相对渗透率曲线联用计算分类井地质储量[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发,2007,26(6):61-63. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.-2007.06.015 WANG Zheqin, WU Xiaohui, ZHANG Yongmei, et al. Combination application of waterflooding curve and relative permeability curve to calculate the geologic reserves of different typed wells[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2007, 26(6):61-63. doi:10.-3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2007.06.015
[13] 王怒涛,张风波,罗志锋,等. 油井单井控制储量确定新方法研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报, 2007, 29(5):77-78. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2007.05.021 WANG Nutao, ZHANG Fengbo, LUO Zhifeng, et al. A new method determing oil well control reserves[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University, 2007, 29(5):77-78. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2007.05.021
[14] 彭珏,康毅力. 润湿性及其演变对油藏采收率的影响[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2008, 15(1):72-76. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2008.01.022 PENG Jue, KANG Yili. Effects of wettability and its evolution on oil reservoir recovery[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2008, 15(1):72-76. doi:10.3969/j.-issn.1009-9603.2008.01.022
[15] 宁玉萍,王峻峰,罗东红,等. 流花油田礁灰岩储层微观性质及驱替特征研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(6):34-44. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2017.09.04.02 NING Yuping, WANG Junfeng, LUO Donghong, et al. Study on the displacement characteristics and microscopic properties of the reef limestone reservoir in Liuhua Oilfield[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2017, 39(6):34-44. doi:10.-11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2017.09.04.02
[16] OWENS W W, ARCHER D L. The effect of rock wettability on oil-water relative permeability relationships[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1971, 23(7):873-878. doi:10.2118/3034-PA
[17] MASALMEH S K. The effect of wettability heterogeneity on capillary pressure and relative permeability[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 2003, 39(3-4):399-408. doi:10.1016/S0920-4105(03)00078-0
[18] 陈蓉,曲志浩,赵阳. 油层润湿性研究现状及对采收率的影响[J]. 中国海上油气(地质), 2001, 15(5):350-355. CHEN Rong, QU Zhihao, ZHAO Yang. The study history of reservoir wettability and its effect on recovery[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas (Geology), 2001, 15(5):350-355.
[19] 刘中云,曾庆辉,唐周怀,等. 润湿性对采收率及相对渗透率的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2000, 21(2):148-150. doi:10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2000.02.014 LIU Zhongyun, ZENG Qinghui, TANG Zhouhuai, et al. Effect of wettability on recovery and relative permeability[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2000, 21(2):148-150. doi:10.-3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2000.02.014
[20] 程林松,李丽,李春兰. 考虑水驱油藏润湿性变化的数值模拟方法[J]. 水动力学研究与进展, 2003, 18(6):786-791. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4874.2003.06.018 CHENG Linsong, LI Li, LI Chunlan. Reservoir numerical simulation with variable rock wettability[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2003, 18(6):786-791. doi:10.3969/j.issn.-1000-4874.2003.06.018
[21] 吴素英. 胜坨油田二区沙二段83层储层润湿性变化及对开发效果的影响[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2006, 13(2):72-74. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2006.02.-022 WU Suying. Reservoir wettability change of the 83 stratum of Es2 in Block No.2 of Shengtuo Oilfield and its influence on development effect[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2006, 13(2):72-74. doi:10.3969/j.-issn.1009-9603.2006.02.022
[22] 马明学,鞠斌山,王书峰. 注水开发油藏润湿性变化及其对渗流的影响[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2013, 41(2):82-86. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2013.02.016 MA Mingxue, JU Binshan, WANG Shufeng. Wettability change and its effect on flow in waterflooding reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2013, 41(2):82-86. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0890.2013.02.016
[23] FENG Qihong, ZHANG Jin, WANG Sen, et al. Unified relative permeability model and waterflooding type curves under different levels of water cut[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017, 154:204-216. doi:10.-1016/j.petrol.2017.04.031
[24] 李金宜,陈丹磬,周凤军,等. 疏松砂岩密闭取芯井新鲜样品和洗油样品相对渗透率曲线差异性研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 33(1):39-46. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-064X.2018.01.007 LI Jinyi, CHEN Danqing, ZHOU Fengjun, et al. Study on difference between relative permeability curves of fresh and washed unconsolidated sandstone cores from sealed coring wells[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 33(1):39-46. doi:10.3969/j.-issn.1673-064X.2018.01.007
[25] 缪飞飞,刘小鸿,张宏友,等. 相对渗透率曲线标准化方法评价[J]. 断块油气田, 2013, 20(6):759-762. doi:10.6056/dkyqt201306020 MIAO Feifei, LIU Xiaohong, ZHANG Hongyou, et al. Evaluation on standardized methods of original relative permeability curves[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2013, 20(6):759-762. doi:10.6056/dkyqt201306020