考虑次生裂缝的页岩气藏有限导流缝网模型

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.09.17.06

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 139-145.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.09.17.06

考虑次生裂缝的页岩气藏有限导流缝网模型

方全堂¹, 李政澜¹, 段永刚¹, 魏明强¹, 张羽翼²

1. 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室·西南石油大学, 四川成都 610500;
2. 西南交通大学利兹学院, 四川成都 611756

收稿日期:2019-09-17 出版日期:2019-12-10 发布日期:2019-12-10
通讯作者: 方全堂,E-mail:Fangqt@live.com
作者简介:方全堂,1980年生,男,汉族,湖北洪湖人,实验员,博士,主要从事油气渗流方面的研究。E-mail:Fangqt@live.com;李政澜,1992年生,男,汉族,四川仁寿人,博士研究生,主要从事油气藏动态分析研究工作。E-mail:lizhenglanswpu@163.com;段永刚,1963年生,男,汉族,四川仁寿人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事复杂结构井渗流、试井和产能评价、完井等方面的教学及科研工作。E-mail:nanchongdyg@163.com;魏明强,1986年生,男,汉族,四川隆昌人,讲师,博士,主要从事试井及油气藏动态分析研究工作。E-mail:weiqiang425@163.com;张羽翼,1999年生,男,汉族,四川成都人,计算机应用技术专业,主要从事软件研发工作。E-mail:sc17y3z@leeds.ac.uk
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05037-006）；四川省科技计划重点研发项目（2018JZ0079）

The Finite-conductivity Fracture Networks Model in Shale Gas Reservoirs with Consideration of Induced Fractures

FANG Quantang¹, LI Zhenglan¹, DUAN Yonggang¹, WEI Mingqiang¹, ZHANG Yuyi²

1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
2. Southwest Jiaotong University Leeds Joint School, Chengdu, Sichuan 611756, China

Received:2019-09-17 Online:2019-12-10 Published:2019-12-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了考虑次生裂缝对页岩气井压力响应特征的影响，建立了耦合多重运移机制的页岩气藏有限导流缝网流动模型，并开展了压力动态特征的研究。首先，通过Laplace空间源函数、局部坐标转换及叠加原理得到耦合吸附解吸、扩散、渗流的气藏解析解。然后，基于有限差分方法及交汇单元流量分配变换，推导得到裂缝单元的数值解。耦合气藏及裂缝两部分的流动，半解析计算求解得到了考虑次生裂缝影响的压力响应曲线，并对次生裂缝组数、导流能力、裂缝角度等反映次生裂缝特征的参数进行了敏感性分析。结果表明，该模型存在10个典型流动阶段，能有效表征次生裂缝对曲线形态的影响，对页岩气压力动态特征的研究具有重要指导意义。

关键词: 页岩气藏, 次生裂缝, 压裂水平井, 有限导流, 压力动态

Abstract: In order to analyze the influence of secondary induced fractures on the pressure response of shale gas wells, a finite conductivity fracture network flow model of shale gas reservoir with coupling multiple migration mechanism has been established, and the pressure dynamic characteristics have been studied. Firstly, the analytical solution of pressure in shale gas reservoir has been obtained by employing Laplace space source function, local coordinate transformation and superposition principle. Then, based on the finite difference method and the flow distribution transformation of intersection element, the numerical solution of fracture element has been derived. By coupling the flow of gas reservoir and fracture, the pressure response curve considering the influence of secondary fracture was drawn, and the influences of characteristic parameters (such as the number of secondary fracture groups, secondary fracture angle, and fracture conductivity, etc.) were analyzed. The results show that there are 10 typical flow stages, which can effectively characterize the influence of secondary fractures. In addition, the presented model will be helpful for understanding the transient performance of multi-stage fractured horizontal wells with consideration of induced fractures.

Key words: shale gas reservoir, secondary induced fractures, fractured horizontal well, finite-conductivity, pressure performance

中图分类号:

TE312

方全堂, 李政澜, 段永刚, 魏明强, 张羽翼. 考虑次生裂缝的页岩气藏有限导流缝网模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 139-145.

FANG Quantang, LI Zhenglan, DUAN Yonggang, WEI Mingqiang, ZHANG Yuyi. The Finite-conductivity Fracture Networks Model in Shale Gas Reservoirs with Consideration of Induced Fractures[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 139-145.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.09.17.06

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2019/V41/I6/139

参考文献

[1] JAVADPOUR F. Nanopores and apparent permeability of gas flow in mudrocks (shales and siltstone)[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2009, 48(8):16-21. doi:10.2118/09-08-16-DA
[2] NELSON P H. Pore-throat sizes in sandstones, tight sandstones, and shales[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2009, 93(3):329-340.
[3] 王祥,刘玉华,张敏,等. 页岩气形成条件及成藏影响因素研究[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2010, 21(2):350-356. WANG Xiang, LIU Yuhua, ZHANG Min, et al. Conditions of formation and accumulation for shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2010, 21(2):350-356.
[4] 邹才能,董大忠,王社教,等. 中国页岩气形成机理、地质特征及资源潜力[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2010, 37(6):641-653. ZOU Caineng, DONG Dazhong, WANG Shejiao, et al. Geological characteristics, formation mechanism and resource potential of shale gas in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37(6):641-653.
[5] 郭晶晶. 基于多重运移机制的页岩气渗流机理及试井分析理论研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2013. GUO Jingjing. Research on multiple migration mechanisms and well testing theory for shale gas reservoirs[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2013.
[6] 赵玉龙. 基于复杂渗流机理的页岩气藏压裂井多尺度不稳定渗流理论研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2015. ZHAO Yulong. Research on transient seepage theory of fractured wells with complex percolation mechanisms in multiscale shale gas reservoir[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2015.
[7] BROWN M, OZKAN E, RAGHAVAN R, et al. Practical solutions for pressure-transient responses of fractured horizontal wells in unconventional shale reservoirs[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2011, 14(6):663-676. doi:10.2118/125043-PA
[8] REN Zongxiao, WU Xiaodong, LIU Dandan, et al. Semianalytical model of the transient pressure behavior of complex fracture networks in tight oil reservoirs[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 2016, 35:497-508. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2016.09.006
[9] ANDRADE P J F, CIVAN F, DEVEGOWDA D, et al. Design and examination of requirements for a rigorous shalegas reservoir simulator compared to current shale-gas simulator[C]. SPE 144401 MS, 2011. doi:10.2118/144401-MS
[10] OZKAN E, RAGHAVAN R S, APAYDIN O G. Modeling of fluid transfer from shale matrix to fracture network[C]. SPE 134830 MS, 2010. doi:10.2118/134830-MS
[11] 高杰. 页岩气藏多段压裂水平井压力动态特征研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2014. GAO Jie. Study on pressure dynamics of multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2014.
[12] REN Junjie, GUO Ping. A novel semi-analytical model for finite-conductivity multiple fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 24:35-51. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2015.-03.015
[13] 魏明强. 页岩气藏压裂水平井数值试井及产量递减分析理论研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2016. WEI Mingqiang. Research on numerical well testing and production decline analysis theory for multi-fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2016.
[14] ZHAO Yulong, ZHANG Liehui, XIONG Ye, et al. Pressure response and production performance for multifractured horizontal wells with complex seepage mechanism in box-shaped shale gas reservoir[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 32:66-80. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2016.04.037
[15] CHANG Jincai, YORTSOS Y C. Pressure transient analysis of fractal reservoirs[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1990, 5(1):31-38. doi:10.2118/18170-PA
[16] 孙致学,姚军,樊冬艳,等. 基于离散裂缝模型的复杂裂缝系统水平井动态分析[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(2):109-115. doi:10.3969/j.issn.-1673-5005.2014.02.017 SUN Zhixue, YAO Jun, FAN Dongyan, et al. Dynamic analysis of horizontal wells with complex fractures based on a discrete-fracture model[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2014, 38(2):109-115. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2014.02.017
[17] 贾品,程林松,黄世军,等. 压裂裂缝网络不稳态流动半解析模型[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(5):107-116. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.-2015.05.015 JIA Pin, CHENG Linsong, HUANG Shijun, et al. A semianalytical model for transient flow behavior of hydraulic fracture networks[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum, 2015, 39(5):107-116. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2015.05.015
[18] ZENG Fanhua, ZHAO Gang, LIU Hong. A new model for reservoirs with a discrete-fracture system[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2012, 51(2):127-136. doi:10.2118/150627-PA
[19] JIA Pin, CHENG Linsong, HUANG Shijun, et al. Transient behavior of complex fracture networks[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2015, 132:1-17. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2015.04.041
[20] 贾品,程林松,黄世军,等. 水平井体积压裂缝网表征及流动耦合模型[J]. 计算物理, 2015, 32(6):685-692. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-246X.2015.06.008 JIA Pin, CHENG Linsong, HUANG Shijun, et al. Characterization of fracture network by volume fracturing in horizontal wells and coupled flow model[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2015, 32(6):685-692. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-246X.2015.06.008
[21] LANGMUIR I. The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum[J]. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1918, 40(9):1361-1403. doi:10.1021/ja02242a004
[22] 李政澜. 页岩气藏压裂水平井试井分析理论研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2017. LI Zhenglan. Research on well testing theory of fractured horizontal wells for shale gas reservoirs[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2017.

考虑次生裂缝的页岩气藏有限导流缝网模型

The Finite-conductivity Fracture Networks Model in Shale Gas Reservoirs with Consideration of Induced Fractures

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张博宁, 张芮菡, 吴婷婷, 鲁友常. 致密气藏多级压裂水平井生产动态机理分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 107-117.
[2]	张烈辉, 崔乾晨, 谢军, 郑健, 李成勇. 页岩气藏压裂水平井线性耦合渗流模型研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 1-12.
[3]	李勇明, 骆昂, 吴磊, 伊向艺. 考虑应力敏感和水力裂缝方位角的页岩产能模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 117-123.
[4]	张烈辉, 刘沙, 雍锐, 李博, 赵玉龙. 基于EDFM的致密油藏分段压裂水平井数值模拟[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(4): 1-11.
[5]	白慧, 田敏, 冯敏, 刘鹏程, 王海涛. 低渗气藏多级压裂水平井产能模型及影响因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(3): 113-120.
[6]	王妍妍, 王卫红, 胡小虎, 刘华, 郭艳东. 基于压裂效果评价的页岩气井井距优化研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(5): 131-139.
[7]	曾杨, 张烈辉, 康晓东, 谢晓庆. 存在有限导流断层的条带状油藏试井新模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(5): 155-162.
[8]	刘启国, 金吉焱, 贵富, 李科, 成显安. 存在直线断层的复合模型试井曲线特征研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(4): 113-118.
[9]	周拓, 刘学伟, 王艳丽, 秦春光, 盖长城. 致密油藏水平井分段压裂CO₂吞吐实验研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(2): 125-131.
[10]	付景龙, 丁文龙, 曾维特, 何建华, 王哲. 黔西北地区构造对下寒武统页岩气藏保存的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(5): 22-32.
[11]	陶珍*，田昌炳，熊春明，赵瑞东. 超低渗透油藏压裂水平井注采缝网形式研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(4): 101-109.
[12]	魏漪1，2 *，冉启全1，2，童敏1，2，王志平1，2. 致密油压裂水平井全周期产能预测模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(1): 99-106.
[13]	杨正明*，骆雨田，何英，郭和坤，赵玉集. 致密砂岩油藏流体赋存特征及有效动用研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(3): 85-92.
[14]	郭小哲1 *，周长沙2. 基于扩散的页岩气藏压裂水平井渗流模型研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(3): 38-44.
[15]	姜瑞忠，徐建春*，傅建斌. 致密油藏多级压裂水平井数值模拟及应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(3): 45-52.