西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1): 119-125.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.01.21.03

• 石油与天然气工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

低渗透储层应力敏感特征探讨

罗川1,2, 周鹏高1,2, 杨虎2,3, 石建刚4   

  1. 1. 克拉玛依职业技术学院石油工程系, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000;
    2. 自然资源部深部地质钻探技术重点实验室·中国地质大学(北京), 北京 海淀 100083;
    3. 中国石油大学(北京)克拉玛依校区, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000;
    4. 中国石油新疆油田公司工程技术研究院, 新疆 克拉玛依 834000
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-21 出版日期:2020-02-10 发布日期:2020-02-10
  • 通讯作者: 罗川,E-mail:1420983699@qq.com
  • 作者简介:罗川,1986年生,女,汉族,四川南充人,讲师,硕士,主要从事油藏工程方面的研究。E-mail:1420983699@qq.com;周鹏高,1981年生,男,汉族,湖北天门人,工程师,硕士,主要从事石油工程岩石力学方面的研究。E-mail:1353443828@qq.com;杨虎,1974年生,男,汉族,新疆克拉玛依人,高级工程师,博士,主要从事石油工程岩石力学方面的研究。E-mail:411195188@qq.com;石建刚,1982年生,男,汉族,新疆哈密人,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事钻井工艺方面的研究。E-mail:53549334@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    克拉玛依市创新人才工程项目(2019RC003A);自然资源部深部地质钻探技术重点实验室(中国地质大学(北京))开放基金(KF201802)

Stress Sensitivity Characteristics of Low Permeability Reservoirs

LUO Chuan1,2, ZHOU Penggao1,2, YANG Hu2,3, SHI Jiangang4   

  1. 1. Department of Petroleum Engineering, Karamay Vocational&Technical College, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Deep GeoDrilling Technology, Ministry of Natural Resources, China University of Geosciences(Beijing), Haidian, Beijing 100083, China;
    3. Karamay Campus, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China;
    4. Engineering Technology Research Institute, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China
  • Received:2019-01-21 Online:2020-02-10 Published:2020-02-10

摘要: 学术界对低渗透储层是否存在强应力敏感具有较大争议,给油气生产决策带来困扰。争论的焦点在于,渗透率应力敏感实验过程中岩芯是否发生塑性变形,岩芯与封套之间是否存在微间隙及其对实验结果是否具有重要影响。针对传统实验无法证明岩芯是否发生塑性变形的问题,改进实验方法,在渗透率测试前、后增加岩芯力学测试。根据弹性力学理论和有效应力理论,推导出应力敏感评价的理论公式,并进行了定量计算。实验测试和理论计算结果表明,应力敏感实验过程中,岩芯所受的有效应力小于其弹性极限,岩芯不会产生塑性变形;岩芯与封套之间存在微间隙,对渗透率测试结果及变化规律具有重要影响;低渗透岩芯在低有效应力条件下测得的渗透率具有较大误差;微间隙的存在导致岩芯的应力敏感程度被高估;实验过程中岩芯的应变极小,渗透率变化极其微弱;低渗透储层不存在强应力敏感,一般来说岩石渗透率越低应力敏感性越弱。

关键词: 渗透率, 应力敏感, 微间隙, 岩芯, 理论计算

Abstract: Researchers disagree on the existence of high stress sensitivity in low permeability reservoirs, which has caused hindrance in the policy making in oil and gas production. The focus of these disagreement is to determine if the core undergoes plastic deformation during permeability stress sensitivity tests, if a micro-gap exists between the core and envelope, and if such a gap exhibits significant influences on the experimental results. In view of the incapability of traditional experiments to verify the plastic deformation of the core, the current experimental method is improved by performing mechanical tests on the core before and after conducting the permeability tests. Based on the theories of elastic mechanics and effective stress, the theoretical formula of stress sensitivity evaluation is deduced and quantitatively calculated. Experimental and theoretical results showed that during the stress sensitivity tests, the effective stress on the core is below the elastic limit, indicating that the core do not undergo plastic deformation. A micro-gap is found between the core and envelope, which has a significant effect on the permeability test results and their variations. The permeability of a low permeability core measured under a low effective stress incur considerable measurement errors. The existence of the micro-gap leads to an overestimation of stress sensitivity of the core. During the experiments, the core strain is diminutive, and the resulting change in permeability is extremely small. Therefore, it is concluded that there is no strong stress sensitivity present in the low permeability reservoirs, and in general, the lower is the permeability of the rock, the lower is the stress sensitivity.

Key words: permeability, stress sensitivity, micro-gap, core sample, theoretical computation

中图分类号: