西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 78-87.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2020.04.20.05

• 政治与法律 • 上一篇    下一篇

推进家事纠纷解决非讼化改革之思考

曾明   

  1. 南充市顺庆区人民法院, 四川 南充 637000
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-20 出版日期:2020-07-01 发布日期:2020-07-01
  • 作者简介:曾明(1966-),男(汉族),四川南充人,四级高级法官,硕士,研究方向:民事诉讼法学。

Some Thoughts on the Reform of Non-litigation Resolution of Domestic Disputes

ZENG Ming   

  1. The People's Court of Shunqing District of Nanchong City, Nanchong Sichuan, 637000, China
  • Received:2020-04-20 Online:2020-07-01 Published:2020-07-01

摘要: 当前,司法实务中长期运行的低非讼化纠纷解决途径、方式已经不能满足家事纠纷解决的特殊质效要求。家事纠纷的基本特点、家事纠纷解决之价值追求、克服“对抗—判定”诉讼模式缺陷的要求以及我国家事民族传统、革命司法传统的影响等都决定了家事纠纷解决应走非讼化之路。域外国家已经确立的家事纠纷解决理念、调解优先等程序制度及其实务运行经验,启示着我国家事纠纷解决之非讼化路径选择和方案构建;我国家事纠纷解决的现状以及减轻审判压力的需要迫切要求推进家事纠纷解决非讼化改革。鉴此,我国有必要重新确立家事纠纷非讼化的理念、原则,系统构建促进家事纠纷解决非讼化的程序制度,推进我国家事纠纷解决的非讼化进程。

关键词: 家事纠纷, 非讼化, 司法裁判, 诉讼调解, 人民调解

Abstract: The current practice of low rate of non-litigation resolution cannot satisfy the specific demands of domestic lawsuit cases. This paper suggests that domestic disputes should be resolved in non-litigious ways, based on the nature of family law, the success of foreign experiences and the need to avoid the overflow of litigation cases within the judicial system. A new procedure with Chinese characteristics is supposed to be introduced, which is dedicated to the non-litigation resolution of domestic cases to so as bring the initiative of the arbitrator/judge into full play,and to push forward the building of non-litigation procedure nation-wide. For this purpose,it is necessary to establish a new concept on and principles of non-litigation resolution of domestic cases, to construct the system of non-litigation resolution procedures.

Key words: domestic dispute, non-litigation, judicial judgment, litigation, people's mediation

中图分类号: