纳米尺度页岩储层的气体流动行为分析

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2014.01.07.06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

理论分析及矿场实践表明，页岩气藏采用传统渗流模型预测的产量总是比实际产量低，经典的达西渗流定律
不再具有适应性，需要建立能准确描述页岩介质气体流动行为的数学模型。目前针对页岩气藏的渗流模型基本都是
对传统黏性流动的校正或者在黏性流动模型上简单的附加分子流动项，忽略了黏性流与分子流中间流态的问题。考
虑页岩介质中可能存在不同流态，建立了描述页岩气藏的流动分析模型。计算结果表明：页岩储层的孔隙越小、气体
分子摩尔质量越小、地层压力越低，气体流动越倾向表现为微观流态，表观渗透率与达西渗透率的比值越大。模型可
解释页岩气藏生产时实际产量高于达西模型预测产量，该研究对于指导页岩气藏生产具有重要的指导意义。

关键词: 纳米, 表观渗透率, 纳米孔隙, 水力压裂, 黏性流, 分子流, 过渡流

Abstract:

Shale gas reservoir theory and field practices showed that the actual yield is higher than the predicted production
of traditional seepage flow model，and that classic Darcy percolation law cannot fully describe the shale gas flow behavior
of the shale media. Thus a calculation model for accurate description and calculation of gas flow of shale media needs to be
established. Existing shale gas reservoir seepage flow models are the correction to traditional viscous flow by simply attached
molecular flow，which ignored the middle flow state of the molecular flow and viscous flow，especially for characterization
of transition flow. This paper considers different complex flow pattern in shale media to established gas flow analysis model
of describing the shale reservoir. The calculation results show that the smaller the porosity of shale reservoir is，the smaller
the gas molecular molar mass is and the lower formation pressure could be，the easier gas flow shows the micro flow regime，
and the greater the ratio of the apparent permeability to Darcy permeability is. The model reveals the essential reason why the
shale reservoir actual yield is higher than predicted yield of Darcy model，and the research has significant guiding importance
to direct shale gas reservoir production.

Key words: nanometer, apparent permeability, nanopores, hydraulic fracturing, viscous flow, molecular flow, transition flow

任岚，舒亮，胡永全，赵金洲. 纳米尺度页岩储层的气体流动行为分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2014.01.07.06.

Ren Lan, Shu Liang, Hu Yongquan, Zhao Jinzhou. Analysis of Gas Flow Behavior in Nano-scale Shale Gas Reservoir[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2014.01.07.06.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2014.01.07.06

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2014/V36/I5/111

参考文献

[1] Curtis M E，Ambrose R J，Sondergeld C H，et al. Structural

characterization of gas shales on the micro-and nanoscales[

C]. SPE 137693，2010.

[2] Elgmati M，Zhang H，Bai B J，et al. Submicron-pore characterization

of shales gas plays[C]. SPE 144050，2011.

[3] Yang Feng，Ning Zhengfu，Wang Qing，et al. Integrated study

of reservoir characteristics of a shale gas reservoir: A

case study from Sichuan Basin of China[C]. SPE 165870，

2013.

[4] Elgmati M，Zobaa M，Zhang H，et al. Palynofacies analysis

and submicron pore modeling of shale-gas plays[C].

SPE 144267，2011.

[5] 赵金洲，任岚，胡永全. 页岩储层压裂缝成网延伸的

受控因素分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报：自然科学版，

2013，35（1）：1–9.

Zhao Jinzhou，Ren Lan，Hu Yongquan. Controlling factors

of hydraulic fractures extending into network in shale

formations[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University：

Science & Technology Edition，2013，35（1）：1–9.

[6] Fathi E，Yucel Akkutlu I. Lattice boltzmann method for

simulation of shale gas transport in Kerogen[C]. SPE

146821，2011.

[7] Yan B，Alfi M，Wang Y，et al. A new approach for

the simulation of fluid flow in unconventional reservoirs

through multiple permeability modeling[C]. SPE 166173，

2013.

[8] Darishchev A，Nancy E N S G，Lemouzy P，et al. On simulation

of flow in tight and shale gas reservoirs[C]. SPE

163990，2013.

[9] Javadpour F，Fisher D，Unsworth M. Nanoscale gas flow

in shale gas sediments[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum

Technology，2007，46（10）：55–61.

[10] 李晓强，周志宇，冯光，等. 页岩基质扩散流动对页岩

气井产能的影响[J]. 油气藏评价与开发，2011，5（1）：

67–70.

Li Xiaoqiang，Zhou Zhiyu，Feng Guang，et al. The impact

of shale matrix diffusion on shale gas capacity[J]. Reservoir

Evaluation and Development，2011，5（1）：67–70.

[11] 于荣泽，卞亚南，张晓伟，等. 页岩储层流动机制综

述[J]. 科技导报，2012，30（24）：75–79.

Yu Rongze，Bian Yanan，Zhang Xiaowei，et al. A review

of flow mechanisms in shale gas reservoir[J]. Science &

Technology Review，2012，30（24）：75–79.

[12] 魏云，赵自斌. 页岩气藏的渗流机理[J]. 辽宁化工，

2013，42（2）：152–153.

Wei Yun，Zhao Zibin. Percolation mechanism of shale

gas[J]. Liaoning Chemical Industry，2013，42（2）：

152–153.

[13] 郭为，熊伟，高树生，等. 页岩纳米级孔隙气体流动特

征[J]. 石油钻采工艺，2012，34（6）：57–60.

Guo Wei，Xiong Wei，Gao Shusheng，et al. Gas flow characteristics

in shales nanopores[J]. Oil Drilling & Production

Technology，2012，34（6）：57–60.

[14] 李治平，李智锋. 页岩气纳米级孔隙渗流动态特征[J].

天然气工业，2012，32（4）：50–53.

Li Zhiping，Li Zhifeng. Dynamic characteristics of shale

gas flow in nanoscale pores[J]. Natural Gas Industry，

2012，32（4）：50–53.

[15] Shabro V，Torres-Verdín C，Javadpour F. Numerical simulation

of shale-gas production：from pore-scale modeling

of slip-flow，knudsen diffusion，and langmuir desorption to reservoir modeling of compressible fluid[C]. SPE

144355，2011.

[16] Beskok A，Karniadakis G E. A model for flows in channels，

pipes，and ducts at micro and nano scales[J]. Microscale

Thermophysical Engineer，1999，3（1）：43–77.

[17] Faruk Civan. Effective correlation of apparent gas permeability

in tight porous media[J]. Transport in Porous Media，

2010，82（2）：375–384.

[18] Faruk Civan，Deepak Devegowda，Richard Sigal. Critical

evaluation and improvement of methods for determination

of matrix permeability of shale[C]. SPE 166473，2013.

[19] Mohammad R R，Aguilera R，Kantzas A. A new unified

diffusion viscous flow model based on pore level studies

of tight gas formations[C]. SPE 149223，2011.

[20] Sakhaee-Pour A，Steven L B. Gas permeability of

shale[C]. SPE 146944，2011.

[21] 王瑞，张宁生，刘晓娟，等. 页岩气扩散系数和视渗

透率的计算与分析[J]. 西北大学学报：自然科学版，

2013，43（1）：75–88.

Wang Rui，Zhang Ningsheng，Liu Xiaojuan，et al. The

calculation and analysis of diffusion coefficient and apparent

permeability of shale gas[J]. Journal of Northwest University：

Natural Science Edition，2013，43（1）：75–88.

[22] 姚军，孙海，樊冬艳，等. 页岩气藏运移机制及数值模

拟[J]. 中国石油大学学报，2013，37（1）：91–98.

Yao Jun，Sun Hai，Fan Dongyan，et al. Transport mechanisms

and numerical simulation of shale gas reservoirs[J].

Journal of China University of Petroleum：Natural Science

Edition，2013，37（1）：91–98.

[23] 程远方，董丙响，时贤，等. 页岩气藏三孔双渗模型的

渗流机理[J]. 天然气工业，2012，32（9）：44–46.

Cheng Yuanfang，Dong Bingxiang，Shi Xian，et al. Seepage

mechanism of a triple-porosity/dual-permeability

model for shale gas reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry，

2012，32（9）：44–46.

[24] Hassan Dehghanpour，Mahdy Shirdel. A triple porosity

model for shale gas reservoirs[C]. SPE 149501，2011.

[25] Shi Juntai，Zhang Lei，Li Yuansheng，et al. Diffusion and

flow mechanisms of shale gas through matrix pores and

gas production forecasting[C]. SPE 167226，2013.

[26] Michel G G，Sigal R F，Civan F，et al. Parametric investigation

of shale gas production considering nano-scale pore

size distribution，formation factor，and non-darcy flow

mechanisms[C]. SPE 147438，2011.

[27] Javadpour F. Nanopores and apparent permeability of

gas flow in mudrocks(shales and siltstone)[J]. Journal of

Canadian Petroleum Technology，2009，48（8）：16–21.