非均匀地应力下裂缝性地层封堵承压效果预测

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2023.09.04.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 承压堵漏是解决裂缝性地层井漏问题的重要方法，准确预测地层封堵承压能力是科学利用承压堵漏技术的核心基础。为此，在分析非均匀地应力状态下裂缝宽度变化特征的基础上，基于叠加原理推导了任意封堵位置处裂缝尖端应力强度因子计算公式，建立了裂缝性地层封堵承压能力解析预测模型。与传统模型相比，新模型的预测结果具有更高的精度和可靠性。最后，分析了不同工程地质参数对裂缝封堵承压效果的影响规律。结果表明，增加裂缝尖端长度，同时降低裂缝尖端流体压力，有利于提高地层的封堵承压能力；当在井壁附近形成低渗透封堵层时，有必要对封堵层长度进行优化，以最大化地提高地层的封堵承压能力；当地层渗透率确定时，裂缝封堵承压效果随着地应力比的增加而降低，随着弹性模量、泊松比以及断裂韧性的增加而增大。

关键词: 裂缝性地层, 井漏, 裂缝宽度预测, 承压堵漏, 参数化分析

Abstract: Pressure-bearing plugging is an important method to solve the problem of lost circulation in fractured formation. Accurate prediction of pressure-bearing capacity of leakage formation is the core basis of scientific application of pressure-bearing plugging technology. For this purpose, on the basis of analyzing the variation of fracture width under non-uniform in-situ stress, the crack tip stress intensity factor when considering in-fracture plugging is derived based on superposition principle, and an analytical model for predicting the pressure-bearing capacity of plugged fractured formation is established. Compared with the traditional model, the prediction results of this model have higher accuracy and reliability. Finally, the influence of different engineering and geological parameters on the pressure-bearing capacity of plugged fracture is analyzed. The results show that increasing the fracture tip length and reducing the fluid pressure at the fracture tip during plugging treatment are beneficial to improving pressure-bearing capacity of fractured formation. When a low-permeable plugging zone is formed in the vicinity of borehole wall, it is necessary to optimize the length of the plugging zone to maximize the pressure-bearing capacity of plugged fracture. When the formation permeability is determined, pressure-bearing capacity of plugged fracture decreases with the increase of the ratio of in-situ stresses, and increases with the increase of elastic modulus, Poisson's ratio and fracture toughness.

Key words: fractured formation, lost circulation, fracture width prediction, pressure-bearing plugging, parametric analysis

中图分类号:

TE21

刘阳, 张沛, 马琪, 王俊力, 马天寿. 非均匀地应力下裂缝性地层封堵承压效果预测[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 47(6): 119-128.

LIU Yang, ZHANG Pei, MA Qi, WANG Junli, MA Tianshou. Prediction of the Effect of Pressure-bearing Plugging of Fractured Formation Under Non-uniform In-situ Stress[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2025, 47(6): 119-128.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2023.09.04.01

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2025/V47/I6/119

参考文献

[1] 王业众，康毅力，游利军，等. 裂缝性储层漏失机理及控制技术进展[J]. 钻井液与完井液， 2007， 24（4）: 74-77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2007.04.023 WANG Yezhong, KANG Yili, YOU Lijun, et al. Progresses in mechanism study and control: Mud losses to fractured reservoirs[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2007, 24(4): 74-77. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2007.04.023
[2] 孙金声，白英睿，程荣超，等. 裂缝性恶性井漏地层堵漏技术研究进展与展望[J]. 石油勘探与开发， 2021， 48（3）: 630-638. doi: 10.11698/PED.2021.03.18 SUN Jinsheng, BAI Yingrui, CHENG Rongchao, et al. Research progress and prospect of plugging technologies for fractured formation with severe lost circulation[J]. Petroleum Exploration & Development, 2021, 48(3): 630-638. doi: 10.11698/PED.2021.03.18
[3] 许成元，闫霄鹏，康毅力，等. 深层裂缝性储集层封堵层结构失稳机理与强化方法[J]. 石油勘探与开发， 2020， 47（2）: 399-408. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.02.19 XU Chengyuan, YAN Xiaopeng, KANG Yili, et al. Structural failure mechanism and strengthening method of plugging zone in deep naturally fractured reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(2): 399-408. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.02.19
[4] 张婧，衡德，徐兴海，等. 页岩地层油基高滤失承压堵漏技术[J]. 特种油气藏， 2025， 32（4）: 143-148. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2025.04.017 ZHANG Jing, HENG De, XU Xinghai, et al. Oil-based high filtration loss pressure-bearing plugging technology for shale formations[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2025, 32(4): 143-148. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2025.04.017
[5] 范桃园，吕承训，吕古贤. 构造成矿作用的地应力分析: 研究现状与思考[J]. 现代地质， 2024， 38（4）: 865-872. doi: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2024.086 FAN Taoyuan, LÜ Chengxun, LÜ Guxian. Analysis of crustal stress in tectonic ore-forming processes: Research status and thought[J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(4): 865-872. doi: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2024.086
[6] MORITA N, BLACK A D, GUH G F. Theory of lost circulation pressure[C]. SPE 20409-MS, 1990. doi: 10.2118/20409-MS
[7] ASTON M S, ALBERTY M W, MCLEAN M R, et al. Drilling fluids for wellbore strengthening[C]. SPE 87130-MS, 2004. doi: 10.2118/87130-MS
[8] ALBERTY M W, MCLEAN M R. A physical model for stress cages[C]. SPE 90493-MS, 2004. doi: 10.2118/90493-MS
[9] WANG Hong, TOWLER B F, SOLIMAN M Y. Fractured wellbore stress analysis: Sealing cracks to strengthen a wellbore[C]. SPE 104947-MS, 2007. doi: 10.2118/104-947-MS
[10] FENG Y, ARLANOGLU C, PODNOS E, et al. Finiteelement studies of hoop-stress enhancement for wellbore strengthening[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2015, 30(1): 38-51. doi: 10.2118/168001-PA
[11] DUPRIEST F E. Fracture closure stress (FCS) and lost returns practices[C]. SPE 92192-MS, 2005. doi: 10.2118/92192-MS
[12] van OORT E, FRIEDHEIM J E, PIERCE T, et al. Avoiding losses in depleted and weak zones by constantly strengthening wellbores[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2011, 26(4): 519-530. doi: 10.2118/125093-PA
[13] 王贵，蒲晓林，文志明，等. 基于断裂力学的诱导裂缝性井漏控制机理分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报（自然科学版）， 2011， 33（1）: 131-134. doi: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2011.01.023 WANG Gui, PU Xiaolin, WEN Zhiming, et al. Mechanism of controlling lost circulation in induced fracture formation based on fracture mechanics[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2011, 33(1): 131-134. doi: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2011.01.023
[14] 杨沛，陈勉，金衍，等. 裂缝承压能力模型及其在裂缝地层堵漏中的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报， 2012， 31（3）: 479-487. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.03.006 YANG Pei, CHEN Mian, JIN Yan, et al. Crack pressure bearing capacity model and its application to plugging of fractured formation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(3): 479-487. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.03.006
[15] MORITA N, FUH G F. Parametric analysis of wellborestrengthening methods from basic rock mechanics[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2012, 27(2): 315-327. doi: 10.2118/145765-PA
[16] XU C, KANG Y, TANG L, et al. Prevention of fracture propagation to control drill-in fluid loss in fractured tight gas reservoir[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2014, 21: 425-432. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2014.08.021
[17] 贾利春，陈勉，谭清明，等. 承压封堵裂缝止裂条件影响因素分析[J]. 石油钻探技术， 2016， 44（1）: 49-56. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.201601010 JIA Lichun, CHEN Mian, TAN Qingming, et al. Key factors for inhibiting fracture propagation during leakage control under pressure[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2016, 44(1): 49-56. doi: 10.11911/syztjs.201601010
[18] ZHONG R, MISKA S, YU M. Parametric study of controllable parameters in fracture-based wellbore strengthening[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 43: 13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.03.018
[19] LIU Yang, MA Tianshou, CHEN Ping, et al. Effects of permeable plugs on wellbore strengthening[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2020, 132: 104416. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2020.104416
[20] 邱正松，暴丹，刘均一，等. 裂缝封堵失稳微观机理及致密承压封堵实验[J]. 石油学报， 2018， 39（5）: 587-596. doi: 10.7623/syxb201805010 QIU Zhengsong, BAO Dan, LIU Junyi, et al. Microcosmic mechanism of fracture-plugging instability and experimental study on pressure bearing and tight plugging[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(5): 587-596. doi: 10.7623/syxb201805010
[21] 许成元，张敬逸，康毅力，等. 裂缝封堵层结构形成与演化机制[J]. 石油勘探与开发， 2021， 48（1）: 202-210. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804（21）60019-8 XU Chengyuan, ZHANG Jingyi, KANG Yili, et al. Structural formation and evolution mechanisms of fracture plugging zone[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2021, 48(1): 202-210. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(21)60019-8
[22] WANG H M, SWEATMAN R, ENGELMAN B, et al. Best practice in understanding and managing lost circulation challenges[J]. SPE Drilling & Completion, 2008, 23(2): 168-175. doi: 10.2118/95895-PA
[23] HILLERBORG A, MODÉER M, PETERSSON P E. Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1976, 6(6): 773-781. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7
[24] CARBONELL R, DETOURNAY E. Modeling fracture initiation and propagation from a pressurized hole: A dislocation-based approach[C]. Reno: The 35th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), 1995.
[25] RAHIMI R, ALSABA M, NYGAARD R. Analysis of analytical fracture models for wellbore strengthening applications: An experimental approach[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 36: 865-874. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.11.022
[26] ZHANG Jincao, YIN Shangxian. A three-dimensional solution of hydraulic fracture width for wellbore strengthening applications[J]. Petroleum Science, 2019, 16: 808-815. doi: 10.1007/s12182-019-0317-7
[27] TADA H, PARIS P C, IRWIN G R. The stress analysis of cracks handbook[M]. 3rd Ed. New York: ASME Press, 2000. doi: 10.1115/1.801535
[28] 许成元. 裂缝性储层强化封堵承压能力模型与方法[D]. 成都:西南石油大学， 2015. XU Chengyuan. Models and methods to strengthen wellbore pressure containment by fracture plugging in fractured reservoirs[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2015.
[29] 穆英，胡志明，邹才能. 海相页岩储层水岩作用及其对开发效果的影响研究进展[J]. 天然气与石油， 2023， 41（3）: 64-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5539.2023.03.010 MU Ying, HU Zhiming, ZOU Caineng. Research progress on water-rock interactions of marine shale reservoir and its influence on development effect[J]. Natural Gas and Oil, 2023, 41(3): 64-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5539.2023.03.010
[30] 刘鹏林，李军，连威，等. 浸泡条件下页岩力学及摩擦特征实验[J]. 断块油气田， 2024， 31(4): 734-739. doi: 10.6056/dkyqt202404022 LIU Penglin, LI Jun, LIAN Wei, et al. Experiments on mechanics and friction characteristics of shale under soaking conditions[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2024, 31(4): 734-739. doi: 10.6056/dkyqt202404022