四川盆地中西部筇竹寺组凹槽相区页岩沉积环境及发育模式

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2024.11.18.03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 四川盆地凹槽相区筇竹寺组贫、富有机质两类页岩气勘探获得重大突破，但其有机质富集程度、页岩气储层特征及形成条件等与龙马溪组表现出极大差异。通过对筇竹寺组凹槽相区的岩性、粒度、矿物组成、有机碳含量、成烃生物和微痕量元素等特征的综合分析，明确了早寒武世筇竹寺期四川盆地中西部“两台夹一槽”的构造格局以及独特的拉张构造背景为筇竹寺组页岩构建了相对稳定的半开放—半封闭沉积环境，高可容纳空间与丰沛的陆源碎屑输入为筇竹寺组粉砂质页岩广泛发育奠定了物质基础，井研地区和资阳地区筇竹寺期沉积水体及沉积微相的变化是导致贫、富有机质两类页岩交替发育的主要原因，建立了四川盆地中西部凹槽相区筇竹寺组浅水亚相—深水亚相页岩发育模式。该模式可以指导此类型的页岩气勘探，为优质页岩分布预测、甜点层段优选提供科学依据。

关键词: 筇竹寺组, 凹槽, 地化特征, 沉积环境, 页岩发育模式

Abstract: Significant breakthroughs have been made in the exploration of two types of shale gas, poor and rich in organic matter, in the Qiongzhusi Formation of the groove facies area in the Sichuan Basin. However, the degree of organic matter enrichment, shale gas reservoir characteristics, and formation conditions are significantly different from those of the Longmaxi Formation. Through comprehensive analysis of the lithology, grain size, mineral composition, organic carbon content, hydrocarbon generating organisms, and trace elements of the shale in the groove facies area of the Qiongzhusi Formation, we clarify the structural pattern of the "two platforms sandwiching one trough" in the central and western parts of the Qiongzhusi Formation during the Early Cambrian. The unique extensional tectonic background constructed a relatively stable semi open and semi closed environment for the sedimentation of the Qiongzhusi Formation shale. The high accommodation space and abundant input of terrestrial debris have laid the material foundation for the widespread development of the Qiongzhusi Formation silty shale. The changes in sedimentary water bodies and microfacies during the Qiongzhusi period in the Jingyan and Ziyang areas are the main reasons for the alternating development of two types of shale: poor organic matter and shale with rich organic matter. Therefore, a shallow water subfacies and deep water subfacies shale development model for the Qiongzhusi Formation in the groove facies areaa of the Sichuan Basin has been established, which has important reference value and guiding significance for the exploration of new types of shale gas under the background of extensional structures.

Key words: Qiongzhusi Formation, groove facies area, geochemical characteristics, sedimentary environment, shale development model

中图分类号:

TE122

魏力民, 冯少柯, 顾战宇. 四川盆地中西部筇竹寺组凹槽相区页岩沉积环境及发育模式[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 46(6): 45-60.

WEI Limin, FENG Shaoke, GU Zhanyu. Shale Sedimentary Environment and Development Model in the Groove Facies Area of Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in the Central and Western Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2024, 46(6): 45-60.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2024.11.18.03

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2024/V46/I6/45

参考文献

[1] 郭彤楼，熊亮，叶素娟，等. 输导层（体）非常规天然气勘探理论与实践——四川盆地新类型页岩气与致密砂岩气突破的启示[J]. 石油勘探与开发， 2023， 50（1）： 24-37. doi： 10.11698/PED.20220759 GUO Tonglou, XIONG Liang, YE Sujuan, et al. Theory and practice of unconventional gas exploration within carrier beds: Insight from the breakthrough of new type of shale gas and tight gas in Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(1): 24-37. doi: 10.11698/PED.20220759
[2] 何骁，梁峰，李海，等. 四川盆地下寒武统筇竹寺组海相页岩气高产井突破与富集模式[J]. 中国石油勘探， 2024， 29（1）： 142-155. doi： 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2024.01.011 HE Xiao, LIANG Feng, LI Hai, et al. Breakthrough and enrichment mode of marine shale gas in the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in high-yield wells in Sichuan Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2024, 29(1): 142-155. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2024.01.011
[3] 周文，徐浩，余谦，等. 四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组与筇竹寺组页岩含气性差异及成因[J]. 岩性油气藏， 2016， 28（5）： 18-25. doi： 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2016.05.002 ZHOU Wen, XU Hao, YU Qian, et al. Shale gas-bearing property differences and their genesis between Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation and Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and surrounding areas[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2016, 28(5): 18-25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2016.05.002
[4] WEI Wei, DONG Linhui, XIAO Shuhai, et al. Seawater barium and sulfide removal improved marine habitability for the Cambrian Explosion of early animals[J]. National Science Review, 2024, 11(8): 237. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwae237
[5] 赵文智，李建忠，杨涛. 中国南方海相页岩气成藏差异性比较与意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发， 2016， 43（4）： 499-510. doi： 10.11698/PED.2016.04.01 ZHAO Wenzhi, LI Jianzhong, YANG Tao. Geological difference and its significance of marine shale gases in South China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(4): 499-510. doi: 10.11698/PED.2016.04.01
[6] 王世谦，陈更生，董大忠，等. 四川盆地下古生界页岩气藏形成条件与勘探前景[J]. 天然气工业， 2009， 29（5）： 51-58. doi： 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2009.05010 WANG Shiqian, CHEN Gengsheng, DONG Dazhong, et al. Accumulation conditions and exploitation prospect of shale gas in the Lower Paleozoic Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(5): 51-58. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2009.05010
[7] 李贤庆，王元，郭曼，等. 川南地区下古生界页岩气储层孔隙特征研究[J]. 天然气地球科学， 2015， 26（8）： 1464-1471. doi： 10.11764/j.issn.1672-19-26.2015.08.1464 LI Xianqing, WANG Yuan, GUO Man, et al. Pore characteristics of shale gas reservoirs from the lower Paleozoic in the south of Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(8): 1464-1471. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2015.08.1464
[8] 邹才能，董大忠，王玉满，等. 中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景（二） [J]. 石油勘探与开发， 2016， 43（2）： 166-178. doi： 10.11698/PED.2016.02.02 ZOU Caineng, DONG Dazhong, WANG Yuman, et al. Shale gas in China: Characteristics, challenges and prospects (II)[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(2): 166-178. doi: 10.11698/PED.2016.02.02
[9] 赵建华，金之钧，林畅松，等. 上扬子地区下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩沉积环境[J]. 石油与天然气地质， 2019， 40（4）： 701-715. doi： 10.11743/ogg20190402 ZHAO Jianhua, JIN Zhijun, LIN Changsong, et al. Sedimentary environment of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation shale in the Upper Yangtze region[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2019, 40(4): 701-715. doi: 10.11743/ogg2019-0402
[10] HOUGH G A, BREYER J A. Carrier bed plays associated with conventional petroleum accumulations[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2021, 105(9): 1751-1763. doi: 10.1306/04122120043
[11] 吴冬，邓虎成，熊亮，等. 四川盆地及其周缘下寒武统麦地坪组—筇竹寺组层序充填和演化模式[J]. 石油与天然气地质， 2023， 44（3）： 764-777. doi： 10.11743/ogg20230318 WU Dong, DENG Hucheng, XIONG Liang, et al. Sequence filling and evolutionary model of the Lower Cambrian Maidiping-Qiongzhusi formations in Sichuan Basin and on its periphery[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(3): 764-777. doi: 10.11743/ogg20230318
[12] 熊亮，邓虎成，吴冬，等. 四川盆地及其周缘下寒武统筇竹寺组细粒沉积特征与影响因素[J]. 石油实验地质， 2023， 45（5）： 857-871. doi： 10.11781/sysydz202305857 XIONG Liang, DENG Hucheng, WU Dong, et al. Finegrained sedimentary characteristics and influencing factors of the Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Sichuan Basin and on its periphery[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(5): 857-871. doi: 10.11781/sysydz-202305857
[13] 刘树根，王一刚，孙玮，等. 拉张槽对四川盆地海相油气分布的控制作用[J]. 成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）， 2016， 43（1）： 1-23. doi： 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2016.01.01 LIU Shugen, WANG Yigang, SUN Wei, et al. Control of intracratonic sags on the hydrocarbon accumuliations in the marine strata across the Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 43(1): 1-23. doi： 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2016.01.01
[14] 刘树根，孙玮，罗志立，等. 兴凯地裂运动与四川盆地下组合油气勘探[J]. 成都理工大学学报（自然科学版）， 2013， 40（5）： 511-520. doi： 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2013.05.03 LIU Shugen, SUN Wei, LUO Zhili, et al. Xingkai taphrogenesis and petroleum exploration from Upper Sinian to Cambrian Strata in Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2013, 40(5): 511-520. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2013.05.03
[15] 李文正，张建勇，李浩涵，等. 鄂西—渝东地区克拉通内裂陷分布特征及油气勘探意义[J]. 天然气地球科学， 2020， 31（5）： 675-685. doi： 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2020.04.016 LI Wenzheng, ZHANG Jianyong, LI Haohan, et al. Distribution characteristics of intracratonic rift and its exploration significance in western Hubei and eastern Chongqing Area[J]. Nature Gas Geoscience, 2020, 31(5): 675-685. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2020.04.016
[16] LI Zhengxiang. Tectonic evolution of the major east Asian litho-spheric blocks since the Mid-Proterozoic: A synthesis[J]. American Geophysical Union, 1998, 109(1): 16-42. doi: 10.1029/GD027p0221
[17] LI D, LING H, SHIELDS-ZHOU G A, et al. Carbon and strontium isotope evolution of seawater across the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition: Evidence from the Xiaotan section, NE Yunnan, South China[J]. Precambrian Research, 2013, 225: 128-147. doi: 10.1016/j.precamres.2012.01.002
[18] HICKY J H, HENK B. Lithofacies summary of the Mississippian Barnett shale, Mitchell 2 T.P. Sims Well, Wise County, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4): 437-443. doi: 10.1306/12040606053
[19] LOUCKS R G, RUPPEL S C. Mississippian barnett shale: Lithofacies and depositional setting of a deep-water shale gas succession in the Fort Worth Basin, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4): 579-601. doi: 10.1306/11020606-059
[20] PAPAZIS P K. Petrographic characterization of the Barnett shale, Fort Worth Basin, Texas[D]. Austin, Texas: University of Texas at Austin, CDROM (SW0015), 2005.
[21] SUGISAKI R, YAMAMOTO K, ADACHI M. Triassic bedded cherts in central Japan are not pelagic[J]. Nature, 1982, 298: 644-647.
[22] MURRAY R W, TEN BRINK M R B, JONES D L, et al. Rare earth elements as indicators of different marine depositional environments in chert and shale[J]. Geology, 1990, 18(3): 268-271. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1990)01-8<0268:REEAIO>2.3.CO;2
[23] MURRAY R W. Chemical criteria to identify the depositional environment of chert: General principles and applications[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1994， 90(3/4): 213-232. doi: 10.1016/0037-0738(94)90039-6
[24] 侯东壮. 黔东地区黑色岩系地球化学特征及沉积环境研究[D]. 长沙：中南大学， 2011. HOU Dongzhuang. Research on geochemical characteristics and sedimentary environments of black shales in the eastern Guizhou[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2011.
[25] BOSTRÖM K, KRAEMER T, GARTNER S. Provenance and accumulation rates of opaline silica, Al, Ti, Fe, Mn, Cu, Ni and Co in Pacific pelagic sediments[J]. Chemical Geology, 1973, 11（2）: 123-148. doi: 10.1016/0009-25-41(73)90049-1
[26] 谢武仁，姜华，马石玉，等. 四川盆地德阳—安岳裂陷晚震旦世—早寒武世沉积演化特征与有利勘探方向[J]. 天然气地球科学， 2022， 33（8）： 1240-1250. doi： 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2022.03.012 XIE Wuren, JIANG Hua, MA Shiyu, et al. Sedimentary evolution characteristics and favorable exploration directions of Deyang-Anyue Rift within the Sichuan Basin in Late Sinian-Early Cambrian[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2022, 33(8): 1240-1250. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2022.03.012
[27] WANG Jian, LI Zhengxiang. History of neoproterozoic rift basins in South China: Implications for Rodinia breakup[J]. Precambrian Research, 2003, 122(1/4): 141-158. doi: 10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00209-7
[28] 朱光有，赵坤，李婷婷，等. 中国华南地区下寒武统烃源岩沉积环境、发育模式与分布预测[J]. 石油学报， 2020， 41（12）： 1567-1586. doi： 10.7623/syxb202012010 ZHU Guangyou, ZHAO Kun, LI Tingting, et al. Sedimentary environment, development model and distribution prediction of Lower Cambrian source rocks in South China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(12): 1567-1586. doi: 10.7623/syxb202012010
[29] 袁钰轩，李一帆，樊太亮，等. 川西南地区下寒武统细粒沉积岩高精度层序地层特征及其充填演化模式[J]. 地学前缘， 2023， 30（6）： 162-180. doi： 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2023.2.34 YUAN Yuxuan, LI Yifan, FAN Tailiang, et al. Highresolution sequence stratigraphic characteristics and filling evolution model of Lower Cambrian fine-grained sedimentary rocks in southwestern Sichuan[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(6): 162-180. doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2023.2.34
[30] 罗锦宇，祝海华，梁兴，等. 滇黔北坳陷寒武系筇竹寺组岩相古地理特征与优质页岩展布[J]. 沉积学报， 2023， 41（4）： 1257-1270. doi： 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2022.005 LUO Jinyu, ZHU Haihua, LIANG Xing, et al. Lithofacies paleogeography and distribution of high-quality shale of the Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in the Dianqianbei Depression[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2023, 41(4): 1257-1270. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2022.005
[31] 张天怡，黄士鹏，李贤庆，等. 四川盆地下寒武统筇竹寺组沉积地球化学特征与有机质富集机制[J]. 天然气地球科学， 2024， 35（4）： 688-703. doi： 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2023.09.016 ZHANG Tianyi, HUANG Shipeng, LI Xianqing, et al. Sedimentary geochemical characteristics and organic matter enrichment of the Qiongzhusi Formation in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2024, 35(4): 688-703. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2023.09.016
[32] 杨雪. 黔北地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩沉积环境与有机质富集[D]. 北京：中国地质大学（北京）， 2020. YANG Xue. Depositional environment and organic matter accumulation of the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation shale in northern Guizhou[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2020.
[33] 杨振恒，韩志艳，腾格尔，等. 四川盆地南部五峰组—龙马溪组页岩地质甜点层特征——以威远—荣昌区块为例[J]. 天然气地球科学， 2019， 30（7）： 1037-1044. doi： 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2019.04.006 YANG Zhenheng, HAN Zhiyan, TENGGEER, et al. Characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations shale sweet layer: Case study of Weiyuan-Rongchang block of SINOPEC[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2019, 30(7): 1037-1044. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2019.04.006
[34] 郭彤楼，张汉荣. 四川盆地焦石坝页岩气田形成与富集高产模式[J]. 石油勘探与开发， 2014， 41（1）： 28-36. GUO Tonglou, ZHANG Hanrong. Formation and enrichment mode of Jiaoshiba shale Gas Field, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(1): 28-36.
[35] GUO Tonglou, ZENG Ping. The structural and preservation conditions for shale gas enrichment and high productivity in the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation, Southeastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 2015, 33(3): 259-276. doi: 10.1260/0144-5987.33.3.259
[36] MCMAHON T P, LARSON T E, ZHANG T, 等. 美国页岩油气地质特征及勘探开发进展[J]. 石油勘探与开发， 2024， 51（4）： 807-828. doi： 10.11698/PED.20240178 MCMAHON T P, LARSON T E, ZHANG T, et al. Geologic characteristics, exploration and production progress of shale oil and gas in the United States: An overview[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2024, 51(4): 807-828. doi: 10.11698/PED.20240178
[37] 马永生，蔡勋育，赵培荣. 中国页岩气勘探开发理论认识与实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发， 2018， 45（4）： 561574. doi： 10.11698/PED.2018.04.03 MA Yongsheng, CAI Xunyu, ZHAO Peirong. China's shale gas exploration and development: Understanding and practice[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4): 561-574. doi: 10.11698/PED.2018.04.03
[38] 周圆圆，吉珍娃，申宝剑，等. 成烃生物对页岩含气性影响控制因素研究进展[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报， 2017， 36（2）： 332-338. doi： 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2802.2017.02.017 ZHOU Yuanyuan, JI Zhenwa, SHEN Baojian, et al. Research progress on main controlling factor of hydrocarbon forming organisms in gas-bearing property[J]. Bulletin of Mineralogy, Petrology and Geochemistry, 2017, 36(2): 332-338. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2802.2017.02.017
[39] 程青松，石阳志，章超，等. 滇黔北地区下寒武统热水沉积烃源岩发育特征[J]. 海相油气地质， 2023， 28（1）： 55-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2023.01.006 CHENG Qingsong, SHI Yangzhi, ZHANG Chao, et al. Characteristics of the Lower Cambrian hydrothermal sedimentary source rocks in northern Yunnan and Guizhou[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2023, 28(1): 55-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9854.2023.01.006
[40] 梁狄刚，张水昌，陈建平. 南方复杂构造区有效烃源岩评价[R]. 北京： CNPC油气地球化学重点实验室， 2007. LIANG Digang, ZHANG Shuichang, CHEN Jianping. Evaluation of effective source rocks in complex structural regions in the south[R]. Beijing: CNPC Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Geochemistry, 2007.
[41] 陈威振，田景春，林小兵，等. 川西南下寒武统麦地坪组—筇竹寺组元素地球化学特征及其古环境意义——以 JS1井为例[J]. 沉积学报， 20-24， 42（5）： 17841798. doi： 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2022.101 CHEN Weizhen, TIAN Jingchun, LIN Xiaobing, et al. Geochemical characteristics and paleo environmental significance of Lower Cambrian Maidiping and Qiongzhusi Formations in southwestern Sichuan Basin: A case study of Well JS1[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2024, 42(5): 1784-1798. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2022.101
[42] 王兴志，李博，杨西燕，等. 四川盆地北部中二叠世晚期“广元—旺苍”海槽特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发， 2021， 48(3)： 562-574. doi： 10.11698/PED.2021.03.11 WANG Xingzhi, LI Bo, YANG Xiyan, et al. Characteristics of“Guangyuan-Wangcang” trough during late Middle Permian and its petroleum geological significance in northern Sichuan Basin, SW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration & Development, 2021, 48(3): 562-574. doi: 10. 11698/PED.2021.03.11